How have the courts interpreted the entire cause of a defense counsel's failure to give a pinpoint instruction?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Willyard, C087386 (Cal. App. 2019):

Even assuming the trial court erred, the error was harmless. In evaluating the impact of the trial court's refusal to give a pinpoint instruction, we consider " 'the entire cause, including the evidence,' " defense counsel's focus including argument on the evidence supporting the defense theory, and whether any given instructions would have precluded the jury "from giving that evidence its due weight." (People v. Wharton (1991) 53 Cal.3d 522, 571, 572.) We review the erroneous failure to give a pinpoint

Page 11

Other Questions


Does trial counsel shirk his constitutional responsibility to provide competent counsel by failing to ask the court to instruct on a bogus self-defense defense? (California, United States of America)
When there is no substantial evidence to warrant a self-defense instruction, does McNeely's contention that counsel's failure to request the instruction constitute ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does a defense counsel's failure to object to the court's discussion of reasonable doubt constitute ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the test for a defense counsel who "invited" an error in instructions? (California, United States of America)
Can defense counsel argue that defense counsel failed to object to the foregoing procedure or request that written instructions be provided to the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does a defense counsel's failure to request a pinpoint instruction explaining that a subjective rather than objective test applies to reduce murder from first to second degree forfeited the argument? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor asks a defense counsel a question in voir dire about rape and sexual assault, is the defense counsel's failure to object to the questions? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court require a defense counsel to object to a motion where the trial atmosphere was poisonous, and the defense counsel did not object at all? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.