Does a defense counsel's failure to object to the court's discussion of reasonable doubt constitute ineffective assistance of counsel?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Nails, A128270 (Cal. App. 2012):

Defense counsel did not object to the court's initial discussion of reasonable doubt, to the prosecutor's remarks during closing argument, or to the court's reasonable doubt instruction. Respondent argues that appellant has therefore forfeited this issue on appeal. Appellant asserts that he has not forfeited his right to raise this issue because the alleged errors affected his substantial rights. (See People v. Johnson, supra,

Page 36

115 Cal.App.4th at p. 1172 [appellate court may review any instruction given even if no objection was made thereto in trial court, " ' "if the substantial rights of the defendant were affected" ' "].) The prosecutor's comments during closing argument were not "instructions," and appellant forfeited his claim of prosecutorial misconduct on appeal by failing to object to the prosecutor's comments and request an admonition. (See People v. Hill (1998) 17 Cal.4th 800, 820.) Appellant asserts, nonetheless, that counsel's failure to object constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel.

Other Questions


Does a defense counsel's failure to object to a prosecutor's reasonableness comments necessarily constitute ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does a defense counsel's failure to interpose an objection to a misstatement of the law constitute ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's ineffective assistance of counsel result in defense counsel's failure to object? (California, United States of America)
Does Counsel's failure to object to evidence of a hypodermic needle and vial evidence constitute ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does Nauta have to prove that his trial counsel's failure to object constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court require a defense counsel to object to a motion where the trial atmosphere was poisonous, and the defense counsel did not object at all? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance ineffective assistance based on a trial counsel's failure to object to a restitution order? (California, United States of America)
When there is no substantial evidence to warrant a self-defense instruction, does McNeely's contention that counsel's failure to request the instruction constitute ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that trial counsel's failure to object to the prosecutor's remarks amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel in a habeas corpus proceeding? (California, United States of America)
Does Counsel's failure to file a pre-plea recusal motion constitute ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.