The following excerpt is from Gilley v. Madden, No. 2:18-cv-1162 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. 2020):
U.S. at 103. That conclusion is so because the comments can reasonably be said to amount to advice to tell the truth in a general sense, rather than as implied promises of leniency should petitioner change his story to comport with the detectives' narrative. Hutto v. Ross, 429 U.S. at 30. At bottom, fairminded jurists could disagree on the correctness of the decision. Richter, 562 U.S. at 101.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.