How have the courts instructed the jury on the standard of proof in a sexual assault case?

Furthermore the court instructed the jury on the reasonable doubt standard of proof, as well as on the presumption of innocence. "We presume that jurors treat the court's instructions as a statement of the law by a judge, and the prosecutor's comments as words spoken by an advocate in an attempt to persuade." (People v. Clair (1992) 2 Cal.4th 629, 663, fn. 8; see also People v. Smith (2005) 35 Cal.4th 334, 372.)