How have the courts dealt with allegations of improper conduct against appellant in a civil case?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Melendrez-Rodriguez v. United States, 441 F.2d 1109 (9th Cir. 1971):
A review of the record discloses no purpose to degrade appellant by eliciting evidence of improprieties which were unrelated to the veracity of his direct testimony. See Lyda v. United States, 321 F.2d 788, 793 (9th Cir. 1963). In these circumstances, we can find no abuse of discretion.
Judgment affirmed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the pleading standard been interpreted in civil civil cases in the context of civil civil litigation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with allegations of abuse and harassment by county employees in a civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with civil rights claims in civil cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with appeals in civil rights cases involving denial of access to the courts, religious persecution and physical mistreatment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with allegations of historical sexual abuse in cases where there was no physical evidence of the alleged abuse? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with civil cases dealing with the issue of civil liberties? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for whether a plaintiff in a civil case in the US Supreme Court has been found to be a defendant in a federal civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a rule of customary international law to the effect that courts have universal civil jurisdiction to hear civil cases alleging acts in violation of jus cogens? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does a state court have more latitude than a federal court to reasonably determine that a defendant has not satisfied the standard of conduct required for a motion to be heard in a civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with civil cases involving sexual assault cases in the 9th Circuit? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
