How have courts treated the doctrine of negligence per se?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Batton v. Alten Constr., Inc., A135146 (Cal. App. 2013):

6. Although stated as a separate cause of action in Batton's complaint, we construe his negligence per se theory as part of his negligence cause of action. (See Millard v. Biosources, Inc. (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 1338, 1353, fn. 2 ["[T]he doctrine of negligence per se is not a separate cause of action, but creates an evidentiary presumption that affects the standard of care in a cause of action for negligence. [Citation.]"]; accord, Johnson v. Honeywell Internat. Inc. (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 549, 555.) As to both negligence "causes of action," Alten sought summary adjudication on the basis of the delegation-of-duty rationale we discuss above. Triable issues of material fact preclude summary adjudication on that issue.

Other Questions


How have the courts treated a husband's out of court declaration to prove his wife's state of mind? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated expert testimony in the context of police investigations and subsequent court proceedings? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court treat a claim by a defendant that an issue raised and decided in the trial court resulted in constitutional violations? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated a defendant's claim that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct on the elements of rape and sodomy generally? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated evidence that a student was treated radically different than others in a similar situation? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Can the Court of Appeal overturn a finding of negligence and contributory negligence in a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a defendant's claim that counsel failed to object to the trial court's incorrect belief that he had expressed no remorse at his initial sentencing hearing? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the doctrine of negligent misrepresentation in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.