How have courts treated prejudice in cases dealing with personal injury cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Anderson, 144 Cal.App.3d 55, 192 Cal.Rptr. 409 (Cal. App. 1983):
We next turn to the issue of prejudice. In People v. Sedeno (1974) 10 Cal.3d 703, 112 Cal.Rptr. 1, 518 P.2d 913, the court reaffirmed the holding in People v. Modesto (1963) 59 Cal.2d 722, 31 Cal.Rptr. 225, 382 P.2d 33, 2 stating:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the court treated a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of jurisdiction over a person in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated restitution fines and court assessment fees in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the statement of the case in the opening brief of a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
