How have the courts treated restitution fines and court assessment fees in a personal injury case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Briseno, B297164 (Cal. App. 2021):
Appellant contends the trial court erred by requiring him to pay restitution fines and court assessment fees without finding that he had the ability to pay them. As support for this claim, appellant relies on People v. Dueas (2019) 30 Cal.App.5th 1157 (Dueas).)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have assessments and restitution been assessed and/or assessed in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the statement of the case in the opening brief of a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
If a court imposes a restitution fine under Penal Code section 1202.4, must the restitution fine be the same amount as the parole revocation fine? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
