How have courts treated first names in family law cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Smith v. Smith (In re Smith), 195 Cal.Rptr.3d 162, 242 Cal.App.4th 529 (Cal. App. 2015):
2 "As is customary in family law proceedings, we refer to the parties by their first names for purposes of clarity and not out of disrespect." (Rubenstein v. Rubenstein (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 1131, 1136, fn. 1, 97 Cal.Rptr.2d 707.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts treated statutory references to the Family Code in family law cases? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellate court amend an order made by the Superior Court of Justice in a case not before the court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the statement of the case in the opening brief of a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated restitution fines and court assessment fees in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a civil case, how has the court treated the use of DNA evidence in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court treated prior sexual assault cases in the context of domestic violence cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of electronic surveillance in a juvenile court case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated appellant's claim that the court deprived him of his constitutional right to due process by ordering him into placement without an adequate case plan? (California, United States of America)
