How have courts treated expert testimony in medical malpractice cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Bond v. Htrans Inc., D064668 (Cal. App. 2015):
"We review the court's admission of expert testimony for clear abuse of discretion, looking to whether the court's ruling 'exceeded the bounds of reason.' " (Piscitelli v. Friedenberg (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 953, 972.)
Page 26
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts treated expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated the testimony of a forensic expert in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated questions about the depth or scope of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
What is the case law on abuse of expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a court to refuse to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted expert testimony instructions in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated medical malpractice in the context of medical malpractices? (California, United States of America)
