How have the courts interpreted expert testimony instructions in a medical malpractice case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Cruz, F065388 (Cal. App. 2014):

they were free to accord an expert witness's opinion the weight it deserved after considering the bases for the opinion. We presume the jury understood and followed those instructions in the absence of a showing to the contrary. (People v. Alfaro (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1277, 1327-1328.)

Other Questions


In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard jury instruction on expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the instructions in the context of manslaughter instructions in cases where the instruction was limited or limited? (California, United States of America)
What is the case law on abuse of expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a court to refuse to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated questions about the depth or scope of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted a burden-shifting instruction in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.