How have courts treated assertions of error de novo?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Wells, D073814 (Cal. App. 2019):
defense. We review assertions of instructional error de novo. (See People v. Manriquez (2005) 37 Cal.4th 547, 581, 584; People v. Cole (2004) 33 Cal.4th 1158, 1210.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts treated assertions of error de novo? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
In re-examining the findings of the Court of Appeal's error review, what are the consequences of the error where the error is cumulative? (California, United States of America)
When the error is that the error was not intentional, does the error result in the error not being corrected? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court treated its error in granting probation to a defendant who was later convicted of assault? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court treat a claim by a defendant that an issue raised and decided in the trial court resulted in constitutional violations? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated a defendant's claim that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct on the elements of rape and sodomy generally? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with a defendant's claims of error, error, and prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a trial court's error contributed to a jury's error? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a defendant's claim that counsel failed to object to the trial court's incorrect belief that he had expressed no remorse at his initial sentencing hearing? (California, United States of America)
