How have courts interpreted the words "shall" and "all" in Code of Civil Procedure section 437c?

California, United States of America

The following excerpt is from A.H v. Fire Ins. Exch. Inc, F058022, No. MS302 (Cal. App. 2010):

This court has noted the use of the words "shall" and "all" in Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (b)(1) and the resulting importance of complying with its terms. (Haney v. Aramark Uniform Services, Inc. (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 623, 631-632.) In particular, when a moving party contends that a cause of action must fail, the facts material to the legal theory upon which the moving party bases its contention must be identified accurately in the separate statement. (Id. at p. 632.) "Both the court and the opposing party are entitled to have all the facts upon which the moving party

Page 9

Other Questions

How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 1239.3(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, and what are the implications of that section? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 190.3 of the Oklahoma State Code of Civil Procedure when a defendant has been found guilty of misconduct in a civil proceeding? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 17,000 of the California Code of Civil Procedure and how have they interpreted the law? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19996.2(a) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether an employee has been on an unauthorized leave for a period of time? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpreting the meaning of the word "reasonable and common sense interpretation" in the context of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 430.4(4)(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.






Alexi purple


Company

  • About
  • Contact us
  • Press
  • Matters
  • Legal

    • Product

  • How it works
  • Pricing
  • Solo & small firms
  • Midsize firms
  • Large firms
  • In-house counsel

    • Resources

  • Resource hub
  • Sample memos
  • Blog
  • FAQ


    • © Copyright 2023 Alexi Inc. All rights reserved.