How have the courts interpreted section 430.4(4)(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure?

California, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Mankaruse v. Intel Corp., G056143 (Cal. App. 2019):

Plaintiff contends the court violated Code of Civil Procedure section 430.4, subdivision (b) (erroneously cited as section 430.41(4)(c)). This prohibits a demurring party from demurring to an amended pleading on a ground that could have been raised in a demurrer to an earlier version of the pleading. Plaintiff fails to make any argument or explain how this section was allegedly violated. This argument is forfeited for lack of reasoned legal argument. (Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 836, 852.)

Page 16

Other Questions

How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 190.3 of the Oklahoma State Code of Civil Procedure when a defendant has been found guilty of misconduct in a civil proceeding? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 17,000 of the California Code of Civil Procedure and how have they interpreted the law? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 1239.3(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, and what are the implications of that section? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19996.2(a) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether an employee has been on an unauthorized leave for a period of time? (California, United States of America)
Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 213.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.






Alexi purple


Company

  • About
  • Contact us
  • Press
  • Matters
  • Legal

    • Product

  • How it works
  • Pricing
  • Solo & small firms
  • Midsize firms
  • Large firms
  • In-house counsel

    • Resources

  • Resource hub
  • Sample memos
  • Blog
  • FAQ


    • © Copyright 2023 Alexi Inc. All rights reserved.