How have courts interpreted the term "person" and "personally" in relation to liability?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rener, 24 Cal.App.4th 258, 29 Cal.Rptr.2d 392 (Cal. App. 1994):
Additionally, in People v. Rodriguez (1990) 219 Cal.App.3d 688, 268 Cal.Rptr. 581 this court cited Reed when we identified "person" and "personally" as accepted words of legal art meaning direct, not vicarious, liability. (Id. at p. 693, 268 Cal.Rptr. 581.) 5
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted the 'relative responsibility' provisions in relation to child protection legislation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted attorney-client privilege in cases involving personal information disclosure in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the attachable debt provisions of the attachment statute in relation to an automobile liability policy? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a federal agency's interpretation of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted or interpreted the word "or" and "and" in legislation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the common law in determining liability under section 368(a)? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of ambiguity in the context of a personal injury claim? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a motor vehicle insurance contract in the context of an arbitration? (California, United States of America)
How has section 69894.1 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
