How have courts interpreted the Miranda v. Arizona v. Miranda case?

^2. Chatman argued this below. He quoted Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 to the effect that "[w]here rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." (Id. at p. 491.) But the trial court seemed to miss the point. It responded, "[I]t appears that you are mischaracterizing certain case law, for example, the Miranda case, which has nothing to do with what we have here before us in this case." "[Y]ou are throwing in civil and criminal."