How have courts interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of employment law?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Earl v. State Pers. Bd., 179 Cal.Rptr.3d 899, 231 Cal.App.4th 459 (Cal. App. 2014):

We review questions of law, which would include statutory interpretation, de novo. (See Pollak v. State Personnel Bd. (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 1394, 1404 [107 Cal.Rptr.2d 39] .)

[231 Cal.App.4th 463]

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of the statutory framework? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 213.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the statutory language of the Sexual Offences Prevention Act (SVPA) in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the term "excusable neglect" in the context of employment law? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the California Civil Code in the context of "Liberal interpretation"? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted language in the context of a statutory requirement that states that a person must have a valid claim to be registered as a registered invalid? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the case law in the context of employment law? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.