How have courts interpreted language in the context of a statutory requirement that states that a person must have a valid claim to be registered as a registered invalid?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Rodriguez v. Brill, 184 Cal.Rptr.3d 265, 234 Cal.App.4th 715 (Cal. App. 2015):
Lungren v. Deukmejian (1988) 45 Cal.3d 727, 735, 248 Cal.Rptr. 115, 755 P.2d 299 [ambiguous language is read in light of the statutory scheme, rather than in isolation].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
When interpreting statutory language, does the language "in context of the statutory framework as a whole" apply? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of the statutory framework? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the definition of a "mining claim" in the context of a claim for unpaid wages? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 213.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of ambiguity in the context of a personal injury claim? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of ambiguity in the context of a personal injury claim? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the statutory language of the Sexual Offences Prevention Act (SVPA) in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
