How have courts interpreted section 12652(c)(10) of the California False Claims Act?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Rothschild v. Tyco International (Us), Inc., 83 Cal.App.4th 488, 99 Cal.Rptr.2d 721 (Cal. App. 2000):

We cannot determine, from the face of the statute, the meaning of the word "related" and thus conclude that the language of section 12652(c)(10) is ambiguous. Thus, we must look to the other provisions and the purposes of the False Claims Act to determine the meaning of section 12652(c)(10). (See Webster v. Superior Court (1988) 46 Cal.3d 338, 344, 250 Cal. Rptr. 268, 758 P.2d 596.)

ii. Other sources of statutory interpretation

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1192.7(c)(7) of the California Three Strikes Act, or does the Attorney General's interpretation of section 667.5(c))(7(b)(7)? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
How has section 69894.1 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any power or authority to interpret a section of the California Penal Code that is ambiguous and ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
If two groups are not similarly situated under section 243.1 and section 243(c) of the California Civil Code, can one group make an equal protection claim? (California, United States of America)
How has section 667.5(b) of the California Criminal Code been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the definition of gross negligence under section 192(c)(3) of the California Highway Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a claimant bring a claim for damages against a public entity under section 946.6 of the California Claims Act for failing to act on a timely claim? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.