How have courts interpreted language in the context of vexatious conduct?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Wolfgram v. Wells Fargo Bank, 53 Cal.App.4th 43, 61 Cal.Rptr.2d 694 (Cal. App. 1997):
9 Language in Muller v. Tanner (1969) 2 Cal.App.3d 445 at page 453, 82 Cal.Rptr. 738, that "It may be assumed that the trial court will recognize that success breeds success when it is proper to do so" does not mean a trial court has discretion to review the soundness of the underlying suits, only that the trial court does consider the merits of the suit in which the litigant is claimed to be vexatious.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the section 12652(d)(4) of the California Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the context of frivolousness, vexatiousness and harassment? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted contract language in the context of a class action waiver? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted language in the context of a statutory requirement that states that a person must have a valid claim to be registered as a registered invalid? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of the statutory framework? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a motor vehicle insurance contract in the context of an arbitration? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the language of Ford v Chambers v. Chambers in the context of the doctrine of 'proceeding beyond a reasonable doubt'? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word "qualifying conduct" in the context of sexual assault legislation? (California, United States of America)
