How have courts interpreted evidence in the context of methamphetamine abuse cases?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from The People v. Glover, F058328, No. 08CM7651 (Cal. App. 2010):

Relying on People v. McCullough (1979) 100 Cal.App.3d 169 at pages 179 through 180, defendant asserts that the officer's testimony of defendant's admissions was direct evidence that he knew of the syringes containing methamphetamine, but it was circumstantial evidence of whether he knew the syringes containing methamphetamine

Page 4

Other Questions


In determining the sufficiency of evidence in a civil case, how have courts considered the evidence in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, how have the courts dealt with claims that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of the victim's other sexual conduct? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated evidence in the context of evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
When will a court accept uncharged conduct evidence in the context of other sex abuse cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of abuse of the abuse of evidence in a criminal case where a defendant admitted to a prior burglary? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the rules of evidence in cases dealing with self-confessed statements made outside of court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Does the court have any case law with respect to the interpretation of the law in the context of personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
What are some of the rulings for abuse of the courts in cases involving abuse of evidence? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 352 of the California Evidence Code for excluding prejudicial evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.