How have courts interpreted "criticisms of policy, wisdom or technique inherent in any legislative enactment"?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Horwath v. Local Agency Formation Com., 143 Cal.App.3d 177, 191 Cal.Rptr. 593 (Cal. App. 1983):
Moreover, and particularly where the legislative purpose is otherwise apparent, " 'criticisms of policy, wisdom or technique inherent in any legislative enactment "are matters with which the courts have no concern, such arguments being proper ones to address to the legislature for its determination." ' " (Richardson v. City of San Diego, 193 Cal.App.2d 648, 651, 14 Cal.Rptr. 494.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated criticism of legislation in the context of legislation being challenged in the courts? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted or interpreted the word "or" and "and" in legislation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a federal agency's interpretation of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted legislation in the context of the California Courts? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the principle of law where a new reapportionment plan developed through the legislative process is less unconstitutional than the old one? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted "three strikes" legislation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the equal protection clause in the context of legislative reapportionment litigation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a motor vehicle insurance contract in the context of an arbitration? (California, United States of America)
How has section 69894.1 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
