How have courts interpreted "commercial establishment" in section 459.5 of the Ontario Constitution?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Jones, E065897 (Cal. App. 2017):
Even assuming the People's interpretation of "commercial establishment" is a reasonable and plausible alternative, we may resolve the ambiguity in section 459.5 with reference to other indicia of the voters' intent. (People v. Superior Court (Pearson)
Page 10
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How has section 69894.1 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
How has section 1202.4 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 654 of the Criminal Code of Ontario's Criminal Code when a court finds that a conviction is subject to the provisions of Section 654, subdivision (a) of the Act of the Court of Justice? (California, United States of America)
Is section 28, subdivision (d) of the California Constitution harmonized with section I, article I, section 15 of the constitution with respect to self-incrimination? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 30(e) of the US Constitution on the grounds that the provisions of article 30(E) of Section 50(e of the Civil Rights Act are invalid? (California, United States of America)
How has section 667.5(b) of the California Criminal Code been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of section 28 of the California Constitution when it comes to the exclusion or limitation of prior felony convictions for impeachment? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
