How have courts interpreted a procedural statute relating to jurisdiction where there has been no denial of due process?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Mack v. Ironside, 110 Cal.Rptr. 557, 35 Cal.App.3d 127 (Cal. App. 1973):

That there should be applied such a liberal construction appears from the mandate of Government Code section 65801, which is that no action by any legislative or administrative body shall be set aside by any court as to any matter pertaining to appeals or any matters of procedure whatever, unless after consideration of the entire case, including the evidence, a different result would have been probable if the error had not occurred. Although this section would not confer jurisdiction where none existed, it does justify liberal interpretation of the procedural statute relating to jurisdiction, where there has been no denial of due process. (City of Sausalito v. County of Marin, 12 Cal.App.3d 550, 559, 90 Cal.Rptr. 843.)

Other Questions


Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Is section 1001.36 of the California Criminal Code a "stressed interpretation" of the law and, if so, would it be impertinent for the court to place a strained interpretation upon the statute? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
Does a superior court have jurisdiction to award a judgment for less than the jurisdictional amount of the superior court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted "the people's right to due process" not to include the right to compel the press to supply unpublished information obtained in the newsgathering process? (California, United States of America)
When an agency adopts a new interpretation of a statute and rejects an old interpretation of the statute? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted the 'relative responsibility' provisions in relation to child protection legislation? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have jurisdiction to award costs and attorney fees in a personal injury action where the substantive demand is within the jurisdiction of a municipal court? (California, United States of America)
When harmonizing two statutes relating to the same subject, can a particular or specific statute take precedence over a conflicting general statute? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.