How have courts dealt with the absence of counsel's alleged failings?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Gomez, H036812 (Cal. App. 2011):
resulted in the absence of counsel's alleged failings. (People v. Price (1991) 1 Cal.4th 324, 440; Strickland v. Washington (1994) 466 U.S. 668, 687-688.)
The judgment is affirmed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the court disposed of a motion alleging that the trial court failed to conduct an inquiry into the grounds for appellant's dissatisfaction with appointed counsel? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for failing to provide a reasonable probability that defendant would have obtained a more favourable result if counsel had failed to provide counsel with reasonable counsel? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the appellant's claim that counsel breached rules of court by failing to prepare a complete record? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a defendant's claim that counsel failed to object to the trial court's incorrect belief that he had expressed no remorse at his initial sentencing hearing? (California, United States of America)
Does trial counsel shirk his constitutional responsibility to provide competent counsel by failing to ask the court to instruct on a bogus self-defense defense? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of counsel being ineffective counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a court's frustration and irritation at counsel's repeated efforts to violate evidentiary rules be viewed as "friction between court and counsel"? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a motion for a new trial alleging inadequacy of counsel, does the court have to appoint a new counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does section 7895 of the California Family Code require an appellate court to appoint counsel for a parent unable to afford counsel for their child who is a dependent child of the juvenile court? (California, United States of America)
