How has the jury been instructed to consider penalty and punishment in determining guilt in a sexual assault case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Ochoa, B246266 (Cal. App. 2014):

Furthermore, the trial court promptly admonished the jury it was not to consider penalty and punishment in determining guilt. It also told any juror who had read ahead to ignore the text stricken from the new transcript of the audio tape. This court is entitled to presume that jurors comprehend and accept a trial court's directions and that they generally understand and faithfully follow a trial court's instructions. (People v. Mickey (1991) 54 Cal.3d 612, 689, fn. 17.)

Page 11

The evidence of appellant's guilt was persuasive.

This record fails to demonstrate prejudice, a necessary element of a claim of ineffective trial counsel.

Other Questions


For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law regarding allegations of sexual assault made against appellant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
In a medical malpractice case, in the context of sexual assault allegations, is there any case law where a jury was instructed to consider the evidence in the closing argument? (California, United States of America)
In determining the sufficiency of evidence in a civil case, how have courts considered the evidence in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, is it possible for a defendant to sexually assault two women by touching their genitals? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
When a photograph of a defendant in a sexual assault case was found to have been taken in the context of an alleged sexual assault, is there any connection to the subsequent verdict of attempted sodomy? (California, United States of America)
How have the cases of two separate sexual assault cases been determined to be cross-admissible under section 1101 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
How has the jury been instructed to consider multiple factors in sentencing a defendant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.