The following excerpt is from In re Megan-Racine Associates, Inc., 189 BR 562 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1995):
Generally, the attorney-client privilege shields certain communications between the attorney and the client. The joint-defense privilege widens this sphere. The most common application of the privilege is when attorneys representing different parties pool their information together. In Hunydee v. United States, 355 F.2d 183 (9th Cir.1965), the joint-defense privilege was interpreted so as to shield statements made in furtherance of a common defense by a defendant in front of his attorney, a codefendant and the codefendant's attorney. Courts and commentators have suggested that the Hunydee reasoning can be extended such that even inter-client communications in the presence of their attorneys are protected. See Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena, supra, 406 F.Supp. at 388.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.