How has the court considered "objective standard of reasonableness" in setting an attorney's fee?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Bank of S. Cal., N.A. v. D&D Goryoka, Inc., D072231 (Cal. App. 2018):

The trial court's analysis in this case was consistent with the overall consideration for a Civil Code section 1717 attorney fees award, that is, an "objective standard of reasonableness, i.e., the prevailing market value of comparable legal services." (PLCM Group v. Drexler, supra, 22 Cal.4th at p. 1098.) PLCM emphasized, " ' "We do not want 'a [trial] court, in setting an attorney's fee, [to] become enmeshed in a meticulous analysis of every detailed facet of the professional representation. It . . . is not our intention that the inquiry into the adequacy of the fee assume massive proportions, perhaps dwarfing

Page 14

Other Questions


Is there any case law that would require a trial court to set attorney fees based on actual costs and overhead rather than an objective standard of reasonableness? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant seeks to relieve his court appointed attorney, does the court have a duty to listen to his reasons? (California, United States of America)
Is an attorney bound by a stipulation even when the court considers imposition of harsher sanctions than those stipulated to by the attorney and the state bar? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the "reasonable person" standard in the context of the reasonable person test? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
Is a client's attorney required to repay all moneys laid out by the attorney to the attorney before the client can make a claim against the attorney? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the objective "reasonable person" standard of self-defense? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of care for a reasonably competent, experienced criminal defense attorney to make a decision on whether to object to evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of proof for a prosecutor to argue that a reasonable doubt standard is reasonable? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have forfeited an objection to the amount of restitution set by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.