How has the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure been interpreted in vagueness challenges?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bermudez, 258 Cal.Rptr.3d 689, 45 Cal.App.5th 358 (Cal. App. 2020):
In addressing these contentions, we first discuss the statutes legislative purpose and how it came to include the language now challenged on appeal. (See People v. Grubb (1965) 63 Cal.2d 614, 621, 47 Cal.Rptr. 772, 408 P.2d 100 ( Grubb ) [in determining a vagueness challenge related to statutory terms, consideration of legislative history and statutory purpose is appropriate].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for interpreting the meaning of the word "reasonable and common sense interpretation" in the context of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpretation of the California Code of Civil Procedure when it comes to the interpretation of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 17,000 of the California Code of Civil Procedure and how have they interpreted the law? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant to appeal against the California Supreme Court's finding that the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure is unconstitutional? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 830.6(1) of the California Highway Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether a defendant is immune from liability under the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19996.2(a) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether an employee has been on an unauthorized leave for a period of time? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted "vague statutory language" in the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding nudity? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for "reasonable and common sense interpretation" under the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
