How has Section 1357(g)(10) of the Immigration Code been interpreted by the courts?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from U.S. v. State , 641 F.3d 339 (9th Cir. 2011):

within the constitutional authority of the lawmaking body which passed it, the sole function of the courts is to enforce it according to its terms. Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470, 485, 37 S.Ct. 192, 61 L.Ed. 442 (1917). Section 1357(g)(10) need not be interpreted at allits plain language states that Nothing in this subsection [8 U.S.C. 1357(g) ] shall be construed to require an agreement under this subsection in order for any officer ... to communicate with the Attorney General regarding the immigration status of any individual. There is no need to place restrictions on this meaning, through terms such as calls upon, necessity, systematic, and routine, because the statute's meaning is clear and includes no such limitations.

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted section 56(2) of the Income Tax Code in the context of Section 56(1) and Section 5(2)? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How has Section 1432(a)(5) of the US Immigration Code been interpreted by the Court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does Section 241(f) of the Immigration and Naturalization Service Act apply to aliens who gain entry as a result of fraud in obtaining immigrant visas or fraud upon being inspected as immigrants at the point of entry? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does section 924(a)(1)(B) of the Criminal Code need to be interpreted as the substantive offence defined by section 922(g)? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the words "serious reasons for considering" in Section F of the Employment and Immigration Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 1101(a)(13)(C)(v) of the Immigration Code and what are the implications of that? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the interpretation of reasons in cases involving judicial review in the immigration context? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for interpretation of Section 33 of the O.S.O.A.C.L.B.O., or, if any, how have courts interpreted the relevant provisions in the Equal Access Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.