How has Article XXXIV of the Constitution been interpreted by the Supreme Court?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Board of Supervisors v. Dolan, 119 Cal.Rptr. 347, 45 Cal.App.3d 237 (Cal. App. 1975):
Article XXXIV was held constitutional in James v. Valtierra (1971) 402 U.S. 137, 143, 91 S.Ct. 1331, 28 L.Ed.2d 278, wherein the court stated that 'This procedure ensures that all the people of a community will have a voice in a decision which may lead to large expenditures of local governmental funds for increased public services and to lower tax revenues.'
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a federal agency's interpretation of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
How has section 69894.1 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
How has section 1202.4 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the term "appellate jurisdiction" in article VI, section 11 of the California Constitution? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the constitution in the context of "hot news" news articles? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the exclusionary rule adopted by the California Supreme Court in the context of Proposition 8? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 30(e) of the US Constitution on the grounds that the provisions of article 30(E) of Section 50(e of the Civil Rights Act are invalid? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Three Strikes statute? (California, United States of America)
