How does the history and background of a statutory provision affect a court's interpretation of the statute?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Constr. Indus. Force Account Council, Inc. v. Ross Valley Sanitary Dist., 198 Cal.Rptr.3d 627, 244 Cal.App.4th 1303 (Cal. App. 2016):

"Additionally, "[w]e examine the history and background of the statutory provision in order to ascertain the most reasonable interpretation of the measure." [Citation.] (Doe v. City of Los Angeles (2007) 42 Cal.4th 531, 543 [67 Cal.Rptr.3d 330, 169 P.3d 559].) Even where the plain language of the statute dictates the result, the legislative history may provide additional authority confirming the court's interpretation of the statute. (Id . at p. 544 [67 Cal.Rptr.3d 330, 169 P.3d 559].)" (Boy Scouts of America National Foundation v. Superior Court, supra, 206 Cal.App.4th at p. 443, 141 Cal.Rptr.3d 819.)

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
If a statutory language does not yield a plain meaning, and the legislative history of the legislation is not to be considered in determining the meaning of the statute, can a court rely on the statute itself? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statute of limitations provisions in the California Labor Code? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
When an agency adopts a new interpretation of a statute and rejects an old interpretation of the statute? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the owner provision of the former guest statute on the owner provisions of the guest statute? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of the statutory framework? (California, United States of America)
Does the rule against interpreting statutory language "in a manner that would render some part of the statute surplusage" support a different interpretation? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.