How have courts interpreted statute of limitations provisions in the California Labor Code?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Granite Const. Co. v. W.C.A.B., 112 Cal.App.4th 1453, 5 Cal.Rptr.3d 828 (Cal. App. 2003):

We recognize that "statute of limitations provisions in the Labor Code must be liberally construed in favor of the injured employee and ... such enactments should not be interpreted in a manner which results in loss of compensation unless otherwise compelled by specific statutory language." (Newton v. Workers'

[5 Cal.Rptr.3d 835]

Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 17 Cal.App.4th at p. 154, 21 Cal.Rptr.2d 146.) However, the rule of liberal construction "should not be used to defeat the overall statutory framework and fundamental rules of statutory construction." (Nickelsberg v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1991) 54 Cal.3d 288, 298, 285 Cal.Rptr. 86, 814 P.2d 1328.)

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a federal agency's interpretation of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
Is section 1001.36 of the California Criminal Code a "stressed interpretation" of the law and, if so, would it be impertinent for the court to place a strained interpretation upon the statute? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the arbitration provisions in the California Labor Code? (California, United States of America)
When a section of the California Civil Code provides for construction of a statute, how do courts interpret the construction of the statute? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the provisions of the California Franchise Tax Act and the California Tax Code in the context of the collection and seizure of a taxpayer's property? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the provisions of the California Labor Code and the California Human Rights Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the provisions of Proposition 213 of the California Civil Code 3333.4 of the Vehicle Accident Prevention Act to limit damages in a product liability claim? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.