How do courts interpret the meaning of the digest in a medical malpractice case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Califonia Teachers' Assn v. Governing Board, 141 Cal.App.3d 606, 190 Cal.Rptr. 453 (Cal. App. 1983):

If the language of a statute is ambiguous, it is appropriate to examine the digest in order to ascertain legislative intent. Thus, in Maben v. Superior Court (1967) 255 Cal.App.2d 708, 713, 62 Cal.Rptr. 439, the court stated:

Other Questions


How has the court interpreted the meaning of a plaintiff's statement in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the issue of concurrent or superseding causation in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted a burden-shifting instruction in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted findings of fact and conclusions of law in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of sovereign immunity in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted consent in the context of a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the doctrine of negligent misrepresentation in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How has section 855.4 of the California Medical Code been interpreted in the context of medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted medical malpractice cases in the past? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.