Is there any "palpable or overriding" error which would contradict the findings of fact?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. P.G., 2015 BCSC 2448 (CanLII):
On reviewing the record, there is no “palpable or overriding” error which would contradict the trial judge’s findings of fact: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is palpable and overriding error a palpable or overriding error? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a finding that a judge must not make a finding which would directly contradict a finding previously made by another judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of "palpable and overriding error" in the findings of fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for judicial review of the findings of the Disability Review Officer's findings of fact, law or mixed fact and law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a palpable error or palpable error? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is an "overriding error" in the context of a finding of fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of an error of fact or error of law in the context of an action by the Court of Appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a finding of fact unreasonable and constitutes jurisdictional error? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a judicial review of a finding of fact, law or mixed fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a trial judge has made a palpable and overriding error? (British Columbia, Canada)
