What standard of review is that of correctness or interpretation?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Bosworth v. Jurock, 2013 BCCA 4 (CanLII):
As this appeal involves the interpretation of statutory wording, the appropriate standard of review is that of correctness: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235 at 247. Discussion
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted Bolster Review Review Review for mixed fact and law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an application for judicial review of a statutory tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a "deposit clause" in standard form contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review analysis on a judicial review application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate standard of review for an application for judicial review of patent unreasonableness? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BCSC review the applicable standard of review apply to a point of law arising in interlocutory proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of correctness apply to a decision of an administrative tribunal on an issue of interpretation of its enabling legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of correctness of a review? (British Columbia, Canada)
