How have Rule 20 and Rule 76 interact?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Yue v. Vong, 2012 ONSC 1033 (CanLII):

In Homebrook v. Seprotech Systems Inc. [2011] O.J. No. 2404, I was required to address the interaction of Rule 20 and Rule 76 in the new situation where a two hour discovery was available to each party. The plaintiff moved for summary judgment in a wrongful dismissal action. The defendant wished to examine the plaintiff prior to the summary judgment motion being heard. The pertinent portion of my reasons reads:

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a person who suffers from motor neurone disease has a significant impairment in the way they interact with the world around them? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts considered the interaction between two expert reports? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a nesting order exist between unmarried spouses? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a judicial appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a trial judge's decision not to grant a mobility permit to a custodial parent? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an individual or corporation be found in breach of ss. 27 and 30(1)? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for the application of estoppel principles? (Ontario, Canada)
When parties have joint custody of a child, can the child attend English-only primary school? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there has been or not enough publicity to prevent a fair trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a parent's income? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.