[33] Furthermore, Upper v. Upper extends to support the proposition that, where parties make a conscious decision to resolve a proceeding without the benefit of a completely transparent factual foundation for the consent, they not be permitted later to argue that the form of endorsement or order consented to fails to meet the test for the application of the estoppel principles, thereby leaving open the same facts for use in a subsequent proceeding.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.