Can a shareholder bring an oppressive action against a company?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Gopal v. Burke, 2007 BCSC 1930 (CanLII):

The rule in Foss v. Harbottle (1843), 67 E.R. 189 is that only a corporation is the proper plaintiff to sue in respect of a wrong done to it. Earlier cases dealing with statutory oppression remedy, however, did allow a shareholder to bring an oppressive action even though the company suffered from the alleged wrong.

Other Questions


Can a shareholder of a company who is not a director of the company make an application for an oppressive manner? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a shareholder of a company sue the company for damages arising from a breach of fiduciary trust? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a company be able to bring a Derivative Action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a landlord bring an action to recover the value of chattels that he loaned to a company in which the landlord owns? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a beneficiary of a deceased person bring an action in his name and on behalf of the executor against the deceased's brother and one of his companies? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a managing director of a company acts in breach of his fiduciary duties to the company, does he have to disclose to the purchaser of a part of the company’s business? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a shareholder of a company sue the company for damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an action and a similar action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test to determine whether a third party action should be heard separately or within the main action? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.