What is the test for standing in a corporation action?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cinapri v. Guettler, 1997 CanLII 12432 (ON SC):

The rule which the plaintiff’s counsel invoked is an old one, named for the case which gave it birth, the rule in Foss v. Harbottle. Simply stated, it means that a corporation is a legal entity distinct and separate from its shareholders. When a party decides to do business through a corporate form, even if he or she is the sole shareholder, it means not only what the corporation’s instigator no doubt wants - a limitation on personal liability - but it also means some limitation on that party’s personal rights. Therefore, it has been held that only a corporation has standing to bring an action for a wrong allegedly done to that corporation. Foss v. Harbottle (1843), 2 Hare 461 (U.K.).

Other Questions


How have the courts dealt with the Takacs Corporation's motion to represent the corporations in the Franchise Action? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a director of a corporation liable for deficiencies in management or supervision of the business and affairs of the corporation? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a husband who encumbered his wife's matrimonial home by moving assets to a corporation in which he had no interest in the corporation? (Ontario, Canada)
Is the certification stage of a class action a test of the merits of the action? (Ontario, Canada)
In a condominium corporation action, can the court award only partial indemnity costs or no costs to the successful party? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Visitor have jurisdiction to adjudicate a dispute between a member of a corporation and a non-member of the corporation? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances have courts found that a beneficiary under a power of attorney's will has standing to bring an action to obtain an accounting from his sister? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a condominium corporation commence an action under the Condominium Owners Act? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for dismissing an action as prescribed on the basis that the cause of action had accrued more than 6 years before the Statement of Claim was issued? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the implications of a motion judge's decisions regarding the restoration of an action to the trial list under r.48.11 and the dismissal of an Action for Delay pursuant to r.24.01? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.