How have the courts dealt with the Takacs Corporation's motion to represent the corporations in the Franchise Action?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from 122164 Canada Limited (New York Fries) v C.M. Takacs Holding Corporation, 2015 ONSC 3007 (CanLII):
On November 14, 2012, Mr. Justice Leach dismissed the Takacs’ motion to represent the corporations in the Franchise Action. See C.M. Takacs Corporation v. 122164 Canada Ltd., 2012 ONSC 6456.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
On an interim motion, is it more likely that the court will grant a motion to allow the motion to be heard before trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for representing a representative in a class action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of a court's consideration of time spent preparing for, travelling to and attending court on a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States dealt with the issue of disclosure of confidential information on a Motion for Personal Information Protection? (Ontario, Canada)
In a condominium corporation action, can the court award only partial indemnity costs or no costs to the successful party? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with an application to combine defective water heater cases in the same action? (Ontario, Canada)
When can a corporation be represented in court by a sole director, officer and shareholder? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with a motion for summary judgment against a plaintiff’s own opinion reports? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with a summary judgment motion involving competing expert opinions? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the implications of a motion judge's decisions regarding the restoration of an action to the trial list under r.48.11 and the dismissal of an Action for Delay pursuant to r.24.01? (Ontario, Canada)
