I conclude that the First Offer contained fair terms, and it was unreasonable not to accept it at the time that it issued. The offer addressed all major matters at issue, was delivered well in advance of the trial, and was sufficiently clear and comprehensive so as to allow the respondent to fairly evaluate its merits: Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2011 BCCA 29 at para. 27. The litigation had been ongoing for several years and the parties were thus presumably well aware of the facts underlying the issues when the First Offer was delivered.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.