I would add that certain lower court decisions have regarded the use of female statistics for female plaintiffs as “not appropriate” as a general matter: Fancello v. Cupskey, 2019 BCSC 1724 at para. 233 and Orregaard v. Clapci, 2020 BCSC 1726 at para. 229. This may erroneously imply that female statistics may never be appropriate or of assistance to the court and/or that male statistics should be considered as a default position.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.