What evidence is admissible under s.29 of the Criminal Proceeds of Crime Act?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Germany v Duong, 2018 BCSC 2203 (CanLII):

Under s. 29 of the Act the extradition judge must determine: (1) what evidence is admissible under the Act; and (2) whether the admissible evidence is sufficient to justify committal: United States of America v. Ferras, 2006 SCC 33 at paras. 16 and 36.

Other Questions


Can a class proceeding be the basis for a legal proceeding if the claims presented in that proceeding cannot be sustained individually? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the seizure of a property by the Crown under section 462.34(4) of the Criminal Code of Canada for an alleged criminal enterprise crime offence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for committal under section 29(1) of the Criminal Proceeds of Crime Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on the exclusion of evidence of sexual assault and sexual assault in criminal proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
What summary of evidence is admissible as evidence in an extradition hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What identification issues must a judge address under s. 29(1)(a) of the Criminal Proceeds of Crime Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a mediator be called to give evidence at a legal proceeding regarding communications with parties to mediation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is affidavit evidence admissible in a motor vehicle prohibition application? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff required to lead expert evidence to overcome a no evidence motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an employee of the City of Toronto who has been convicted of sexual assault in a criminal proceeding to a labour arbitration claim that the assault did not occur? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.