What is the test for committal in an extradition hearing?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Canada (Attorney General) v K.T., 2018 BCSC 623 (CanLII):

As Ross J. noted in United States of America v. Pal, 2009 BCSC 1930 at paras. 22-24, the extradition judge may evaluate the body of circumstantial evidence supporting the inferences relied on by the requesting state to ensure that the evidence does not have serious deficiencies. This is because, to come back to the fundamental test for committal, a properly instructed jury could not reasonably infer guilt from a body of circumstantial evidence that has serious deficiencies.

Other Questions


What jurisdiction does an extradition judge have at a committal hearing under the Extradition Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a delay in completing an extradition hearing result in a stay of proceedings at the committal stage? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the scope of an extradition hearing where a Charter issue is directly related to the committal proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the role of an extradition judge in committal hearings? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the role of a judge at an extradition hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of disclosure required by a judge at an extradition hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a refusal of an extradition judge to hear evidence for the purposes of creating a record not a reviewable matter? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of hearing for a hearing at the BC SPCA? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is defence evidence that strikes directly at the reliability of the requesting state’s materials admissible at the extradition hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that an extradition hearing is a trial by jury? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.