Is a refusal of an extradition judge to hear evidence for the purposes of creating a record not a reviewable matter?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Attorney General of Canada (on behalf of the Republic of Italy) v. Seifert, 2003 BCSC 991 (CanLII):
The refusal of the extradition judge to exercise his or her discretion to hear evidence for the purposes of creating a record is not a reviewable matter: United States of America v. Earles, supra, at para. 47.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a judicial review decision by a chambers judge who failed to take the necessary steps to review a decision by the chambers judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge refuse to hear an application to review an order made by the issuing judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by an appellate court reviewing a decision of a trial judge concerning matters of custody and access? (British Columbia, Canada)
When will a trial judge refuse to lead evidence in a voir dire? (British Columbia, Canada)
What jurisdiction does an extradition judge have at a committal hearing under the Extradition Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for certifying the availability of evidence for extradition purposes? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can statements made to doctors as recorded in clinical records qualify as business records? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a Superintendent's Review based upon a written record based upon the Superintendent’s Review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a judge’s role as an appellate judge to second-guess the weight of evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does an extradition judge have greater powers than a preliminary hearing judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
