Is exclusive occupancy of the matrimonial home a re-apportionment?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Brand v. Brand, 2008 BCSC 1541 (CanLII):
Counsel for the plaintiff argues that the defendant’s exclusive occupancy of the matrimonial home since separation is in itself a re-apportionment, Barker v. Barker, 2002 BCCA 345; but given the findings just made and the allowance I have made for occupational rent, the effect of exclusive occupancy is moot at this point.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a warranty exclusion exclusion of economic loss excluded from the warranty exclusion? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an award for occupational rent in a matrimonial home? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for exclusive occupation of a family home? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for exclusive occupancy of a home? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an allowance for occupation rent mandatory if there is a claim for expenses associated with the occupation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is loss of earning capacity an exclusion rider or exclusion rider for personal injury insurance? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for exclusion of evidence in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is compensation going exclusively to reimbursement of expenses considered income for child and spousal support purposes? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will occupation rent be employed in a family litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a fiduciary relationship between parties determined by relationship rather than status or occupation? (British Columbia, Canada)
