In what circumstances will occupation rent be employed in a family litigation?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Elliott v. Elliott, 2013 BCSC 2336 (CanLII):
In family litigation, occupation rent may be employed in order to do equity between the parties. In Ross v. Ross, 2013 BCSC 1716, Verhoeven J. explained the purpose of occupation rent in family matters:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If an employer loses trust in an employee as a result of an employer's orders, in the matter of substance being willfully disobeyed and met with insubordination, can an employer dismiss the employee? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a party seeking to change the date on which to value family property or family debt under the Family Law Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court order occupational rent on behalf of a non-occupying spouse who is unable to access equity in the family home? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the wife be able to advance a claim to other family assets that she now seeks to litigate? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an employer unilaterally change the terms of an employee's employment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for relying on ss. 160-162 of the Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25 [Family Law Act)? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Law Society of BC accept a conditional admission of professional misconduct in circumstances where a lawyer commenced an intimate personal relationship with a man? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is litigation privilege and what is the argument that litigation privilege means? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court refuse to accept an offer to settle with the orders made in a family proceeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a vehicle provided by an employer as a crew bus constitute an extension of the employer's premises? (British Columbia, Canada)
