Is the new rule relating to severance interpreted differently than the previous rule?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ponich Estate (Re), 2011 ABQB 33 (CanLII):
By the court: On whether the New Rule relating to severance should be interpreted differently than the previous Rule: Envision Edmonton Opportunities Society v. Edmonton (City), 2011 ABQB 29
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted Rule 9.13 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the effect of Rule 577.2 of the Rules of Support Guidelines on the basis of marriage? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the common law rule been interpreted in an appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for amendment to Rule 132 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Alberta, Canada)
What documents and records need to be disclosed under Rule 186.1 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the rules relating to perfection of an order made in chambers but withdrawn in open court? (Alberta, Canada)
How has section 1 of the Interpretation Act, 1889, been interpreted? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a solicitor be served as an agent under Rule 16 of the Scottish Rules of Civil Procedure? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the purpose of Rule 217 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the provisions of section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
