Here the bank dealt with the maker of the note alone, and took an instrument which he could not have compelled the defendant to exchange for one in different form. Between the bank and the defendant there was no privity. He had made no representation to them, and they were in no better position to compel him to give them a different endorsement than their customer was: Edge v. Bumford (1862), 31 Beav. 247.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.